And therefore motivations drive cellular daters to ghost? (RQ1)

And therefore motivations drive cellular daters to ghost? (RQ1)

Once again, participants were given the term ghosting and asked so you’re able to suggest how many times participants ghosted most other relationships app profiles (M = dos.17, SD = step one.59) and just how tend to they feel most other relationship application profiles ghost (Yards = step 3.51, SD = 0.88) into a size between 0 = To not 5 = That often.

Face-to-deal with contact

Participants (letter = 211) expressed if they saw the person who ghosted her or him face-to-deal with having address kinds no (0) and you will yes (1; 52.1%).

Time of contact

Participants (letter = 211) indicated the size of the newest contact till the other person ghosted which have address groups (1) a few period or faster (letter = 9), (2) 24 hours (n = 9), (3) a few days (n = 26), (4) weekly (n = 32), (5) a few weeks (letter = 77), (6) 30 days (n = 25), (7) a couple of months (n = 27), (8) six months in order to a-year (n = 4), (9) more than a year (letter = 2) (M = cuatro.77; SD = 1.62).

Concentration of this new contact

This new concentration of the fresh get in touch with was counted having fun with a scale ranging from one = most sporadically in order to eight = very intense (letter = 211; M = 4.98; SD = step one.42).

Amount of sexual closeness

A beneficial categorical variable was applied determine number of sexual intimacy which have solutions ranging from not one (letter = 136), mild (we.age., kissing and you can sexual coming in contact with, letter = 25) and you may big (i.age., oral, genital otherwise anal intercourse, n = 47). Around three respondents didn’t want to share this informative article.

Span solution

Two items from Afifi and Metts’s (1998) violated expectedness scale were used to measure whether the respondents (n = 208) expected the ghosting to occur (1 = completely expected; 7 = not at all expected; M = 5.50; SD = 1.67) and how surprised they were that the ghosting occurred (1 = not at all surprised; 7 = very surprised; M = 5.38; SD = 1.70). Continue reading “And therefore motivations drive cellular daters to ghost? (RQ1)”